Symposium Subtitle

U.S. Arbitration Law in the Wake of AT&T v. Concepcion

First Paragraph

Both sides in the public policy debate over consumer and employment arbitration have recognized the importance of empirical research to making sound policy. Even Public Citizen, a vocal critic of consumer arbitration, has stated that it "agree[s]" that "congressional scrutiny of arbirtation 'can be dangerous if the terms of the debate focus too much on anecdote and too little on systematic study.'" According to Professor Peter B. Rutledge, "it now appears to be a common ground that the policy debate over the Arbitration Fairness Act should focus on empirical data." If so, that is an important and valuable development. Anecdotes alone do not provide a solid basis for legislative or regulatory action.



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.