Emma Kline

First Paragraph

In State ex. Rel. TD Ameritrade, Inc. v. Kaufman, the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia concluded that the Circuit Court of Kanawha County exceeded its authority when it ruled on the merits of an issue that ultimately was referred to arbitration. The Supreme Court of Appeals concluded that when a trial court is required to rule on a motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act ("FAA"), the trial court is limited to determining the threshold issues of: 1) whether a valid arbitration agreement exists between the parties; and 2) "whether the claims averred by the plaintiff fall within the substantive scope of that arbitration agreement."



To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.