•  
  •  
 

Authors

Kathryn Rimpfel

First Paragraph

The denunciation of the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States (“the ICSID Convention”) by Venezuela poses many questions for, and undoubtedly has an impact on, the international investment arbitration community. The January 24, 2012 denunciation by the Latin American oil giant was the third in the history of the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”), preceded by Ecuador in 2009 and Bolivia in 2007. This recent string of departures, as well as a pattern of ICSID awards against Latin American countries, has uncovered displeasure with ICSID and raised questions about the fairness of the institution. Additionally, pending ICSID cases involving Ecuador, Bolivia, and now Venezuela suggest that denunciation does little to address the institution’s decisions toward Latin American countries. Instead, ICSID’s jurisdiction over investment disputes remains in effect through an elaborate web of bilateral investment treaties, State-level legislation, and investment instruments.

Share

COinS
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.