•  
  •  
 

First Paragraph

In Radil v. National Union Fire Insurance Co., the Supreme Court of Colorado held that an excess insurer was bound by the arbitration clause in the primary insurer's uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage when the excess insurer endorsed the primary insurer's coverage by follow-form. The court reasoned that since the excess insurer did not provide any limiting language concerning the scope of the coverage, the follow-form endorsement applied to the entire scope of the primary insurer's coverage, including the arbitral clause. Further, the court rejected the excess insurer's argument that a boilerplate statement found at the end of the policy agreement constituted an express disclaimer of the arbitration clause. The court cited Colorado's strong public policy in favor of arbitration as a mechanism of alternate dispute resolution to support its holding.

Share

COinS
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.